The Minister of Equality accuses Ayuso of “exercising the right power to give women’s lives where it hurts the most” She assures that the regional president “hits women where it hurts the most” by trying to destroy public health and education Montero participates in a reflection table on feminism in the ‘Autumn Uni’ of Podemos The Minister of Equality, Irene Montero, has assured this Saturday that the negotiation to try to renew the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) and the “veto” to the Government delegate against gender violence, Victoria Rosell, has been the last “attempt” of the legislature to try to return to bipartisanship, which longs to see if Podemos can be “charged” in the following elections. In fact, he has ruled that the privileges of the two-party system are the same as machismo. He has also charged against the president of the Community of Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso, saying that it is the “opposite of a feminist woman” because, in his opinion, trial, “exercises the just power to hit women’s lives where it hurts the most” with its desire to “destroy” the common, that is, education and public health. On the other hand, it has proclaimed that the “facha ” and the “hatred” displayed against feminism, but it lacks an alternative and only remains to articulate a reactionary movement in the face of its advance, which it is convinced that the PP will try to join in alliance with Vox if there are no options to return to bipartisanship .This was conveyed during her speech at a table dedicated to reflecting on feminism, within the framework of Podemos’s ‘Autumn Uni’, the purple party’s ideological debate forum and in which she stressed that this movement and Podemos it is clear that he aspires n to exercise power in all the institutions where the popular will places them, although this implies facing “contradictions” in order to transform society. The privileges of bipartisanship are the same as machismo During his speech he criticized the attempt to exclude Rosell in the last negotiations that have failed to try to reshape the CGPJ, on which the PP has wanted to deploy a “political revenge” on a judge who fought to reverse the “judicial harassment” and the “campaign” of discredit against her, achieving the entry of former judge Alba into prison after being caught with the “ice cream cart”. And it is that she has put Rosell as the example of a woman who “from feminism and human rights” is determined to “democratize justice”, against to the “privileges of bipartisanship that are also the privileges of machismo”, slipping by way of reproach that the PSOE would have accepted said exclusion. “It is a feminist way of being in politics that she has a cost and she shows that for the PP she does not have a project for the country (…) they only know that they want the return of bipartisanship if they had managed to make a bipartisan pact, because the PSOE would have accepted Rosell’s veto and we would see. We can already say no, or else a reactionary process with a government of PP and Vox”, Montero launched. Next, the Minister for Equality contrasted Rosell’s values with the management of the president of the Community of Madrid, that has the doctors in the region “desolate” and exhausted due to the lack of personnel. “Ayuso is the opposite of a feminist woman exercising power and not only that, because with her political action that destroys the common that is what she most we need women”, Montero has emphasized. On the other hand, the leader of the purple formation has highlighted that feminism is opposed to the conception of “patriarchal power” because it is capable of displaying “great consensus” and that they are winning against the “reaction”, which only has “brutal hatred” against the group, trying to “erase” the response to the bipartisanship that 15M meant or deploying “political violence” against those who claim the advancement of women’s rights. It has also rec She recognized that conservative movements also try to ensure that women hold limited power to maintain their privileges and therefore, in her opinion, exercising it implies “conflict” and “confrontation.” Sexist violence adapts For its part, the Secretary of State for Equality , Ángela Rodríguez ‘Pam’ has claimed “feminist” power as one of the main tools for social transformation and for this reason the “patriarchy” tries to “beat up every day” the leaders of this movement. She has also denounced that the “sexist violence” is “twisted” and “adapted” to the advance of feminism, to recount the succession of “insults” and “hate” that is displayed against feminists, especially in social networks where a kind of ” witch hunt”. Faced with this drift, Rodríguez ‘Pam’ has defended that feminism only seeks to “democratize power”, stand up to those who want to “annul difference” and “homogenize” society.