Sentenced to five and a half years in prison for sexually abusing the young daughter of his partner in Almería

The convicted abused the minor “continuously” from 2012 to 2017 The Supreme Court rejects the appeal filed by the defense The victim was 7 years old when the abuse began The Supreme Court has confirmed a sentence of five and a half years in prison for a Almería man accused of sexually and continuously abusing the daughter of his sentimental partner since she was seven years old after the girl identified the abuse to which she was subjected when watching a video at her cousins’ house and suffered a crisis nervous in her institute, which led to revealing the facts to the director of the center. The High Court rejects the appeal filed by the defense and ratifies the terms of the original sentence imposed by the Second Section of the Provincial Court of Almería, which also sentenced the man to six years of supervised release and imposed a restraining order for the same period on the victim, whom he had to compensate with 20.00 0 euros. The car, consulted by Europa Press, confirms that sufficient proof of indictment was carried out to demonstrate that the defendant, between 2012 and 2017, abused a daughter of his sentimental partner during the period in which they lived together in the same house , so that the man took advantage of the woman’s absences at home to take the girl to the bedroom and subject her to “obscene touching” of various kinds while he was naked. Thus, and according to the decision issued on appeal by the TSJA, The Supreme Court ratifies the evidence against the minor’s testimony, which was considered “credible, plausible and persistent” in addition to being supported by “various peripheral corroborations.” The victim thus maintained the same version of the facts in her various statements throughout the process, “with a multitude of details and without relevant contradictions”, to which was added the testimony of the director and counselor of the institute, to whom the minor assured that e was not aware of the abuse “until he saw a video at his cousins’ house, because until then he thought what the accused did to him was normal.” the minor’s mother –to whom she did not reveal the facts before for fear that it might harm her– and the psychological expert report, which concluded that the victim’s testimony was “credible.” The same report explained that the minor “had symptoms compatible with the reported experiences of sexual abuse” as well as a symptom picture for “stigmatization due to the violence suffered” among other reactions for which she was referred to the treatment program for minor victims of sexual violence. With this, it is considered that the accused took advantage those moments in which “both of them were alone in the house knowing that their brother would come back from school later”, which gave them a “20-minute period of time” to have committed those abuses you are