Ayuso accuses the Government of carrying out a policy of “energy censorship”: “Madrid will go out if Sánchez imposes it”

The president of the Community of Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso, accused the Government on Monday of carrying out a policy of “energy censorship” in Madrid and in a city like the capital that “has the greatest nightlife”, in the middle of the summer and with measures that “do not have the consensus” of the affected sectors. my Government, but we will go to court. Here the laws are obeyed, but I want to defend the interests of the people of Madrid”, the president stressed to the media in the Plaza de la Villa. Ayuso lamented that the capital of Spain be “the one that turns off its shop windows before” before a decree that “affects tourism”. “It seems senseless to us that we are the capital of Europe that first turns off its shop windows, at the hands of a decree that directly attacks the freedom of business hours of the Community of Madrid, especially affecting tourism and commerce,” he said. In this line, has reiterated that these decisions have been made “in the middle of the summer campaign” and that it will affect “so many private venues, that the rules of the game are always being changed for them”. “We have responded to this energy crisis responsibly with recycling campaigns, appealing to consensus and dialogue. Madrid will go out if Sánchez imposes it,” said the Madrid president. Madrid will appeal the decree to the TC “soon” Ayuso has stated that they will present “soon” an appeal before the Constitutional Court against the decree because they are studying more articles to “strengthen their position”. “We are going to go to the Constitutional Court to appeal this decree with all the tools provided by the rule of law to demonstrate that we have not acted correctly and in accordance with the law,” he said. Likewise, the leader of the PP in Madrid has stressed that the president of the Popular Party, Alberto Núñez Feijóo, agrees with her that this decree portrays the government as “authoritarian, arbitrary and sloppy” and that it is “far from the recommendations that the European Union has requested.”