GREEN (5) He couldn’t do anything about Thomasen’s opener, with a cross shot that he could only accompany. He was not in great demand the rest of the time, except for two or three aerial outings. PALENCIA (5) The Spaniard had not worn the green jersey since January 2020 against Nantes (0-2). For his 10th match with ASSE, he held his place correctly. Clean in his interventions, serious and diligent. It’s already that. And it’s still better than Mason! GIRAUDON (4.5) Captain in the absence of Briançon, the former Trojan did not intervene on the Nimes goal, leaving Thomasen to adjust Green. A better second half, with a distant attempt which forced Dias to relax (75th). But as in Dijon (1-2), we cannot say that he reassured… NADE (5) He often emerged victorious from duels. It must be said that opposite, the Crocos really lacked bite. SILVA (5.5) One of the rare satisfactions of the meeting. Relaunched by the change of system, the Brazilian side has shown enthusiasm and generosity. He even tried to strike (73rd). Exemplary in the state of mind. CAMARA (4.5) The former captain had sunk with the ship in Dijon. Like the team, he was a little better against Nîmes. But we still knew it much more bloody. Spirit, are you really there?NEYOU (4), then MOUEFFEKNeyou had his first tenure on the lawn of the Cauldron since December 2021. The Cameroonian started his match with a dangerous ball loss (4th) and he left himself surprised by Thomasen on the Nîmes goal. Far from the level which was his in his debut in Green, he gave way to MOUEFFEK, more hard-hitting. AOUCHICHE (4), then RIVERAMid midfielder, Aouchiche was active. He had several situations but did not conclude his actions well. Leg crossings before making a pass to the opponent (14th), a shot above (40th)… Still just as desperate and ineffective… Replaced by RIVERA, author of an entry as borrowed as in Dijon , and which one wonders what his true level is too. LOBRY (4.5), then MOUTON For his first at Geoffroy-Guichard, Lobry stood out with a good opening for Aouchiche (28th) and a few crosses. But he had little influence and appeared slow in his movements and transmissions. Replaced by MOUTON.AIKI (4), then CAFAROGoaleur in Dijon, Aiki was little seen for his first tenure with the pros. A few dribbles but it made no difference. Replaced by CAFARO, author of a good long shot (77th) but also quite discreet. KRASSO (5) Very isolated at the point, Krasso did not tremble to convert the penalty. As in Dijon, it was interesting in its discounts, but it was used very little. The team lacked far too much technique, rhythm, binder, percussion, inspiration. So the ball rarely got to him.
Welcome! Log into your account
Recover your password
A password will be e-mailed to you.