The CIS of Tezanos predicts for the first time the victory of the PP over the PSOE – El Mundo

Madrid Updated Tuesday, July 19, 2022 – 14:57 With 12% of the estimated vote, Vox would lose third position in favor of United We Can, which would obtain 13.4% of the ballots Pedro Sánchez and Alberto Nez Feijo greet each other at the Senate. David MudarraPP Survey 67% of Spaniards believe that Sánchez’s new taxes will be “useless” in the face of the economic crisis The Feijo Panel exceeds Sánchez by 38 seats in its first 100 days The Tezanos CIS grants in its July barometer by first time advantage to the PP on the PSOE. According to the poll, the popular ones would be, if the elections were held today, the winners at the polls with an advantage of almost two points -1.9- over the socialists. The poll gives a 30.1% vote intention to the Alberto Nez Feijo’s PP, compared to 28.2% granted to the Socialist Party. Thus, the sign of the polls carried out so far by the Center changes, which over the last few months has kept Pedro Sánchez’s party in the lead, although by a small difference. Last June, the distance between the two formations was 2, 2 points in favor of the PSOE. Now this difference plays on the side of the popular. Vox, for its part, would lose the position of third political force, surpassed by United We Can. For those of Santiago Abascal, the poll gives them an electoral forecast of 12%, compared to the purple ones who would achieve one of their best figures in a long time: 13.4%. In line with the voting intention expressed by the citizens, The advantage that Pedro Sánchez has over the leader of the PP, Alberto Nez Feijo, is also reduced considerably. 22.1% continue to prefer the socialist as Prime Minister, but the popular one is on his heels with 20.8%. The second vice president, Yolanda Díaz, is far from both with 9.1%. Pedro Sánchez is rated “very poorly” by 25% of those surveyed, more than double those who give that rating to Feijo. In fact, 69% say they have little or no confidence in Sánchez and 37% of Socialist voters are included among them. The percentage of distrustful regarding Feijo is 61%. CIS July 2022Among the ministers, those who accumulate the most votes as worst valued include the head of Social Affairs, Ione Belarra; the Minister of Consumption, Alberto Garzn; the Minister for Equality, Irene Montero, and the person in charge of the Interior, Fernando Grande-Marlaska. Regarding the country’s economic situation, 76% rate it as bad or very bad. The negative perception manifests itself across the electoral spectrum regardless of ideology. In this sense, a clear majority of citizens claim to be more concerned about the effects of the crisis on the economy and employment than about its derivatives for health. This is how 53% of those surveyed manifest themselves. This is a logical position if one takes into account that almost 69% believe that the worst of the Covid pandemic is over. On the contrary, 74% say they are very or quite concerned about the war in Ukraine, and even three out of four fear that Putin may be tempted to invade another country. In line with these questions, an overwhelming majority -74%- considers that it is positive for Spain’s interests to be part of NATO. Even the voters of United We Can and ERC agree on this assessment, but not those of the CUP and the BNG. This barometer is the first after the elections in Andalusia that resulted in an overwhelming victory for the PP. It is also the first to be carried out after the assault by immigrants on the Melilla fence, which resulted in thirty or so fatalities, and after the NATO Summit in Madrid. In addition, the CIS has carried out a survey on the general political debate on the state of the Nation. That study gives Pedro Sánchez the victory, although very little. This is the conclusion that emerges from the many questions asked of citizens in relation to the great debate on general politics, a parliamentary session that 46% of those surveyed claim to have followed at least in part and in which a large majority – 68%- claim to have seen more criticism and reproaches against each other than solutions for the country. One in four people -24.1%- of those who claim to have followed the parliamentary session at some point, claim to have “liked it more” the intervention of the Prime Minister compared to only 10% who preferred that of the PP spokesperson, Cuca Gamarra, but an overwhelming majority – two out of three – consider that Sánchez conveyed little or very little confidence in the economic and political future. 48% consider “good or very good” the different interventions of Sánchez compared to 35% who prefer those of the popular spokesperson. However, it is not any of them who managed to penetrate more with his words. The PNV spokesman, Aitor Esteban; the deputy of the Canarian Coalition, Ana Oramas; the Comproms representative, Joan Baldov, and the Ms Pas deputy, igo Errejn, have a great advantage over them. Esteban’s interventions are rated very well or fairly well by 61% of those interviewed; those of Oramas, by 57%; those of Baldov, by 60% and those of Errejn, by 62%. Regarding the president, 34% of those who saw his performance at some point believe that he knew how to convey confidence in the economic future compared to 63% who think so. contrary. Likewise, 29% consider that he transferred security over the political future compared to 68% who do not believe so. There are also more who did not see in Sánchez a clear decision to fulfill his electoral promises -62%- nor a real strength of the Government -61%. points out his sensitivity towards the issues that concern the Spanish. Likewise, his ability to communicate with the citizenry -58%- and his political initiative -61%- stand out. However, the percentages turn against him when they value his realism -59% deny it- or his practical sense -52%. In general terms, 23% think that the Prime Minister raised issues and offered arguments with those who identify and agree, compared to 13% who prefer Gamarra’s questions and reasoning Without a doubt, the absence of the PP leader, Alberto Nez Feijo, is a circumstance that decisively marks the outcome of the debate. The head of the first opposition party had to silently witness the intervention of the President of the Government and his allies who did not hesitate in any case to question him directly, knowing that he would not be able to respond. Pedro Sánchez had the clear path to mark the path of the parliamentary duel neutralizing the list of reproaches from his own partners from the initial speech in which he did not hesitate to snatch his star proposals from the younger brother of the Government, leaving him with no margin to distance himself from a strategy against the country’s first problem -the extremely high inflation- that until then it had been considered very insufficient.According to the criteria ofThe Trust ProjectLearn moreSee links of interest Tour de France, stage 16, live: Carcassonne-Foix