What do the “Uber Files” reveal? “Some practices could be deemed illegal, others raise questions of ethics and transparency” – Le Monde

For Olivier Faure, “the gaze of macronie turns exclusively to the right, and even seeks the complacency of the far right” “The time has come to say and to affirm things”, declared Olivier Faure on LCI tuesday. While he had denounced the day before an “alliance of opportunity” between the majority and the RN during his speech at the podium during the debate on the motion of censure, the first secretary of the PS argued: “What I say today, it’s simply that rather than trying to be a kind of balance between macronie and the left, I am clearly on the left. “Nobody says that we are in the majority”, he continued about the failure of the vote of the motion of censure carried by the deputies of the Nupes. But rejecting the idea that the parliamentarians of the intergroup are creating disorder in the Hemicycle by expressing their opposition, Olivier Faure retorted: What we are saying is that there are only minority groups and that, in order to move forward, it means finding compromises that are useful to the country. And simply, what we observe is that the eyes of macronie turn exclusively to the right, and even seek the complacency of the far right. “If Ms. Borne is ready to increase the minimum wage, to block the prices of basic necessities, if she is ready to make an effort (…), well, we are ready to move forward”, argued the leader. of the PS. He was then questioned about the six socialist deputies who did not vote for the motion of no confidence – the former president of the socialist group Valérie Rabault, Joël Aviragnet, Bertrand Petit, Dominique Potier, Hervé Saulignac and Cécile Untermaier. Mr. Faure stressed that “they signed this motion” when it was tabled last week, with the exception of Dominique Potier. “I imagine that if they signed it, it was because they wanted to vote for it and if they weren’t there, it was because they couldn’t be there,” he said. tried to justify, before specifying: “What I’m going to do is ask them their reasons”, but “there is an inconsistency in signing a text and not voting on it”. About the “Uber Files”, “there will be a commission of inquiry”, “in any case we will ask for it”, assured the Socialist deputy about the Nupes intergroup. Mr. Faure thus castigated the responsibility of Emmanuel Macron who, at the time, was “a minister who was in contradiction with the government and who quietly, in secret, built a deal with a company of which everyone knows today it is a company which is that of the lowest social bidder, which was the right horse of the destruction of our labor code”. For him, Mr. Macron, then Minister of the Economy, contributed to “lowering the level of social and economic protection” of French workers. ” It’s worrying. I would like to know, in France, who governs us: is it Uber, is it McKinsey, is it Capgemini? “, he launched, believing that private “interests” interfere in public decisions.