The Cattle Case: The alleged head of the flow company was asked about the logic of his business – SME

9. June 2022 at 18:32 I Paid content The court continues with the interrogations. BANSKA BYSTRICA. Why did he buy two agribusiness companies when he himself knew nothing about the area? Why did he set up several bank accounts and withdraw hundreds of thousands in cash without obvious economic sense? He denies the blame and the senate is convinced that he only did business normally. The prosecutor and judges then asked him about his business activities, which did not work by default. The article continues under video advertising. were, according to the indictment, in the corruption scheme some sort of intermediaries and a washing machine for bribes. According to the prosecutor’s office, the organized group collected and legalized more than 3.7 million euros from the Eurofunds distributed by the Agricultural Paying Agency (PPA) between 2012 and 2019. “Poragro also cooperated with Krivočenko to clean up the money.” Ľubomír Kropil testified during the investigation, who at the time admitted that he had collected money from farmers. According to the 2016 election, Norbert Bödör was at the top of the chain and Martin Kvietik was close to the CIS after the election, who kept some of the bribes. Sprinkled through K Plus. In 2016, both Miklas and Kropil sold their companies to Kopriv, but the scheme continued. [email protected] so we can help you. “data-msg-btn-logout =” Log in as another user “data-msg-btn-close =” Stay logged in “>