Three ex-representatives react to defeat with Kazakhstan and resignation for coach Tarkovič – ŠPORT.SK

today 16:10 | Our national team wanted to confirm the victory in the opening duel of the C-Division of the League of Nations over Belarus (1: 0) with a full profit in the domestic match against Kazakhstan. It didn’t happen! In the City Arena in Trnava, we lost 0: 1 and hit the ground hard. So, with an unexpected loss, we unnecessarily complicated our chances of advancement. We asked five of our former national team strikers five identical questions in the fight against Kazakhstan: 1. WHAT DO YOU ASK AT THE DOMESTIC MATCH AGAINST KAZAKHSTAN? 2. IS THERE ANY ANYTHING OR SOMETHING THAT PLEASED YOU IN THIS MATCH? 3. TRAINER ŠTEFAN TARKOVIČ HAS SAID SINCE ITS ARRIVAL THAT WE HAVE A PROBLEM IN THE OFFENSIVE PHASE. WHAT IS THAT WE HAVE NOT SUCCESSED IN SUCH LONG TIME? 4. HOW DO YOU PERCEPT THE PROGRESSIVE AMBITIONS OF OUR REPRESENTATION? 5. WHAT DO YOU SAY THAT THIS LOSS WAS REFERRED TO TRAINER ŠTEFAN TARKOVIČ? JOZEF KOŽLEJ 1. “We did not enter the match well, the opponent had two chances in the beginning, which shakes the psyche and partially erodes self-confidence. Then we collected and it was already with us. We had a problem with a well-organized opponent’s defense. We needed to score a goal to break Kazakhstan, which we unfortunately failed to do. That was our biggest problem in this struggle. ”2.“ I confess that there is really little that would please me. Our game was revived after the break by the arrival of Haraslín, who started the opponent’s defense a bit, allowed himself one-on-one fights, opened the wing areas. I also liked Suslov’s activity and efforts. “3.” In my opinion, this is due to the fact that we have little competition in the offensive. We have few quality forward players. After some time, Weiss is back and it can be seen that he has something in him that he can do something surprising that his opponent does not expect. Unfortunately, Marek Hamšík, who was her most important article, ended his national team career and is significantly missing. However, we have to come to terms with that. “4.” I think that our national team is able to give the opponent back the loss and win in Kazakhstan. So I don’t see it in black at all. We will fight for promotion to the B-division, I even think we will eventually advance. “5.” I think it’s a hasty decision, but it’s just my opinion. I do not think that Štefan Tarkovič should have finished after the second match of the League of Nations. It was necessary to wait until the end of the competition. “Slovak footballers after the loss to Kazakhstan Source: TASR RÓBERT SEMENÍK 1.” I don’t think we have a player in the offensive part who can decide the matches. It is also true that it would certainly have been different if we had scored the first goal. But even though we collected, the match was reversed. We benefited from the changes, so maybe the substituting players could have started earlier. ”2.“ After arriving on the lawn, young Suslov started quite well, but then he got unnecessarily upset at the expense of the game discipline. The same goes for Haraslín, who was a bit taken away by his filmmakers in his opponent’s 16th quarter. Undoubtedly, they both revived our game, which may have been due to the fact that the opponent’s players were already more tired. “3.” I mentioned it when Boženík moved abroad. I said that in my opinion it would be better for him to stay in Žilina and win. The same goes for Sagittarius. Almási scores in the Czech league, but somehow he does not succeed. At the moment, we do not have strikers who would play regularly at home or abroad, let alone in the national team. “4.” The group plays in tournaments, so if we manage the next two matches in Azerbaijan and then in Kazakhstan, we have a chance. But if we burn even in Azerbaijan, the advance to the B-division will be in sight. “5.” I’m not saying that it was to be expected, but probably the public pressure after the defeat with Kazakhstan was extremely great. There were only two chances that the next two matches would show how we were doing or end. Nowhere has it been claimed that he has to get the full number of 18 points from six matches, the goal in extending the contract was to advance to the B-division. “MARTIN JAKUBKO 1.” The second thing is that maybe it would be time to think about whether our quality is really the way we think. Whether those boys have more to say or tell the truth, or at the moment when renewing the staff with this team that is there, we simply do not have more. It’s just that the match was completely bad. “2.” Of course, the second half was definitely better than the first, but I think it’s hard to find anything that would please me in this match. The team took over by dropping out of the B-Division of the League of Nations. First of all, players need to realize that they have done something wrong, and to fix it, their approach must be much better than that. It was all wrong… ”3.“ Maybe because the coach doesn’t have better players. Now it’s very difficult and we have very few adepts in the national team. It’s not easy for the team to make up. Of course, if he had two or three players for each post, it would be completely different. Unfortunately, our choice is so narrow that it’s definitely due to that. “4.” It’s played by the system at home – outside, so there’s definitely a chance to advance. the boys can pass the repair right in the next match, but the game must be diametrically different. The chances of progress are and can be said to be quite large. First of all, we must avoid such hesitations as at home against Kazakhstan. “5.” It is a decision of the Executive Committee on the grounds that there were no results. It’s hard for me to comment on that, so the competent people decided. “