The irritated Sulík angered journalists in front of the government: It’s disgraceful! Agreement with the Prime Minister

VIDEO Sulík put in journalists before the government meeting: There is an agreement, we will not comment! Wednesday morning is, as usual, a government meeting. It traditionally begins after 10 o’clock, and so far it has been customary for ministers and members of the government to give a statement even before it began. Well, that seems to be the end. Due to the latest developments, the journalists waited for the Minister of Economy Richard Sulík (SaS) to ask him a number of questions. However, he was obviously not in the mood to answer questions and verbally dressed in journalists. “Let’s talk after the government. Why are you doing this? We don’t have to speak before the government, take note. It’s disgraceful when you always shout questions here. Why are you doing this?” Sulík asks irritably. One of the journalists argued that it had not been a problem so far if the ministers had also spoken before the government meeting. “So we agreed with the prime minister. You won’t miss anything if we tell you a few hours later. Respect it,” Sulík concluded, who then left for the meeting room. Photo gallery (2) Richard Sulík and Branislav Gröhling
Source: Topky / Vlado Anjel Matovič commented However, the Minister of Finance Igor Matovič (OĽaNO) had no problem with the statement before the government meeting, who clarified the proposal to increase taxes to journalists. He will present it to the government on Wednesday. According to him, there will be higher taxes on gambling or gambling. The richest companies will also have higher taxes. However, the proposal provides for higher salaries for teachers by 10 percent from July 1. However, he addressed criticism to his coalition partner. “I believe that SaS-ka will be arguing over the country today that it wants higher teachers’ salaries. So far they have said that the red line is raising taxes on gambling, alcohol and rich companies. Finally, they could read their own program and government program statement and start “I finally fight for higher teachers’ salaries. I believe that the proposal will pass today,” said the finance master. VIDEO Igor Matovič will translate the proposal to increase taxes for companies and higher salaries of teachers to the government According to him, the coalition council, which took place on Tuesday afternoon, was peaceful and included a constructive dialogue. “We have finally exhaled after 2.5 years. I would very much like it to take place in a similar constructive spirit next time,” Matovič added. The last coalition council was held without SaS. The party announced on Tuesday afternoon that it would not attend the meetings until further notice. They decided to calm the society as a whole. Police President on Statement of the Attorney General On Wednesday, Police President Štefan Hamran did not want to comment in detail on the possible monitoring of Attorney General Maroš Žilinka, which was suggested by Žilinka himself. Asked if the head of the prosecutor’s office was being investigated by the police, he said the police had not yet officially confirmed the information. “If someone in this country thinks that the practices of some bodies are against the law, the state has mechanisms to deal with it. There is nothing to prevent the Attorney General from taking steps to get his questions answered, “Hamran said in connection with the Prosecutor General’s statements on Tuesday (June 7). VIDEO Police President Hamran: I knew it would not be a walk in the rose garden. As he pointed out, he does not claim that they were really police officers. Hamran added in this regard that NAKA members do not have a special card, use a Police Force card or a criminal police badge. On Tuesday, the Attorney General rejected efforts to monitor his contacts, contacts and visits in his office. He considers it unacceptable for anyone to find out who he meets with the prosecutor’s office staff. As he emphasized, every single visit is strictly recorded. He stated that if there is a suspicion of a specific illegal act, the illegal act should be legally clarified.