Governments take immediate action to stop spyware, otherwise no phone in the world will be safer. The alarm is sounded by Edward Snowden, the American computer scientist who revealed to the world the scandal of the mass surveillance programs of the National Security Agency (NSA). After the revelations about the Pegasus case, the spying activity conducted by dozens of countries on thousands of cell phones including those of many politicians, journalists, human rights activists and managers, Snowden defines malware as “an industry that shouldn’t. to exist”. Read also He talks about it in an interview with the Guardian, one of the newspapers that made the scoop on Pegasus, starting from a reflection. According to Snowden, one of the greatest risks associated with the spread of spyware is that of increasingly invasive surveillance by the intelligence or police forces. “If they can do the same thing remotely, with little cost and no risk, they always begin to do it against all those they care about even marginally,” he observes. “If nothing is done to stop the sale of this technology – he adds -, the targets will no longer be 50 thousand but 50 million. And this will happen much faster than any of us expect”. In the case of Pegasus, it was also possible to do this by taking advantage of the fact that the systems of many cell phones of the people involved were identical to each other: “Let’s talk about phones that have the same software all over the world. So, if they find ways to hack them one, they found a way to hack them all. ” “It’s like an industry that only produces covid variants to dodge vaccines. Their only products are vectors of infection. They are not safety products. They do not provide any kind of protection. They do not produce vaccine, the only thing they do. they sell – underlines – is the virus “. Making the picture worse, according to Snowden, is the fact that commercial malware like Pegasus’s is so powerful that ordinary people have no weapon to defend themselves: “What can people do to protect themselves from nuclear weapons? there is protection and that is why we must limit the proliferation of these technologies. We must not allow trading in nuclear weapons. “