Trial of the November 13 attacks: the bitterness of the victims and the lawyers in the face of the hearings of the investigators – Franceinfo

Investigators from the anti-terrorism unit of the Federal Judicial Police in Brussels (Belgium) testify by videoconference and anonymously at the trial of the November 13 attacks, which caused controversy. In front of them, the French lawyers, like the victims, denounce a strategy of evasion.

Posted the 11/30/2021 5:31 PM

Update the 11/30/2021 7:28 PM

Reading time : 1 min.

A dozen Belgian investigators are due to come and testify until Tuesday, December 7 at the trial of the November 13 attacks, by videoconference and anonymous. Several have already spoken last week detailing the journey of terrorists in Belgium. Investigators put on the grill after the failure of the investigation, but who do not want to spread out.

>> Trial of November 13: the logbook of an ex-hostage of the Bataclan

These hearings of Belgian investigators were, however, eagerly awaited by the victims and their relatives, eager for answers to the flaws in the case. But above all, they spread a feeling of frustration and anger. “A shame”, is carried away Arthur Dénouveaux, the spokesperson for the association of survivors Life for Paris. “It’s a huge disappointment, there is a kind of sadness too, he blurted out. We came to tell about our pain, to expose ourselves, to tell difficult things. “

“We just have a Belgian system that tries not to be indicted in France, not to give information that could incriminate the way in which the fight against terrorism was carried out in 2015 in Belgium.”

Arthur Dénouveaux, spokesperson for the Life for Paris association

to franceinfo

Same anger on the defense bench. “We have no answer, denounces Me Martin Méchin who defends one of the accused. This is valid both for the civil party and it is also valid for the defense which is very frustrated. “ The lawyer believes that there is “testimonies which do not really correspond to the reality of the case and then there are perjuries, clearly. When a police officer says ‘no, we were not aware of such an element’, I remind you that the police officer takes an oath to tell the whole truth. Clearly, it wasn’t. “

Since last week, five defendants, Salah Abdeslam, Mohamed Abrini, Sofien Ayari, Osama Krayem and Mohamed Bakkali, have refused to take place in the box to challenge the absence in person at the helm of the Belgian investigators and their anonymization.

1 thought on “Trial of the November 13 attacks: the bitterness of the victims and the lawyers in the face of the hearings of the investigators – Franceinfo”