Brhela was released, the reasons for his detention were overlooked by the court – SME.sk

Nov 30, 2021 at 12:03 p.m. I Updated at 12:14

The Supreme Court overturned the judge’s decision in a specialized court.

The article continues under the video ad

The article continues under the video ad

BRATISLAVA. The Supreme Court annulled the decision of the judge of the Specialized Criminal Court Ružena Sabová to extend the detention for the accused oligarch Jozef Brhela.

The Senate thus decided because, according to him, the reasons for the collusive detention have passed. Supreme Court spokeswoman Alexandra Važanová informed about it.

Brhel should remain in custody until December 2.

Related article

Related article The cottage is better for a meeting than the apartment. Where did the conspiracy meetings take place? Read

“At the same time, the Senate rejected the prosecutor’s proposal to extend the detention period of October 29 as well as the complaint of the prosecutor of the Special Prosecutor’s Office against the decision of the judge for the preparatory proceedings of the Specialized Criminal Court of November 23,” the spokeswoman said.

She added that the Senate on the basis of the finding Of the Constitutional Court The Slovak Republic annulled the resolution of the judge for the preparatory proceedings of the Specialized Criminal Court of 12 May.

NAKA detained on January 29 under shares Toll booth of several persons in connection with corruption and machinations in public procurement in the financial administration.

Brhel was abroad at the time. After returning to Slovakia, they took him into custody. He denies the fault.

As part of the event, they also accused his brother Petr, former head of the financial administration František Imrecze, former head of the IT section of the financial administration Milan Greg and the manager of the IT company Allexis Jana Rovčaninová.

His brother Peter Brhel was in custody until April this year. The Attorney General decided on the unfounded nature of the prosecution against him Maroš Žilinka. When applying paragraph 363, he argued mainly in the absence of evidence.

Related article

Related article Zilink was hindered by a single penitent near Brhel. He doesn’t believe it either Read

1 thought on “Brhela was released, the reasons for his detention were overlooked by the court – SME.sk”