The police leak scandal culminates! After Santus, the elite policemen NAKA – Topky.sk will also go to the detector

The police president does not consider it a mistake that investigators continued wiretapping even after they did not record the proceedings related to the poaching case. “The fact that other information is recorded that is relevant to another case does not mean that it must be destroyed.” Hamran said. He referred to the Criminal Code.

Hamran also called it a common practice not to ask for the judge’s consent again. He added that the case of poaching, which was the official reason for wiretapping, was still being worked out in October last year. However, committee member Marián Saloň (Smer-SD) noted that the wiretaps did not begin until July. As Krúpa emphasized, leaks from files have not only a political but also a criminal effect. “The Ministry of the Interior, in cooperation with the National Security Office, is working on new measures that should limit the leakage of such information,” informed.

The committee was held in secret. In addition to the head of the police, the Minister of the Interior Roman Mikulec (OĽANO) was also invited. Videos and their transcripts were published in several media in October, which shows how the head of Smer-SD Robert Fico, the defender of the accused police ex-president Tibor Gašpar Marek Para, former interior minister Robert Kaliňák, businessman Miroslav Bödör and son Tibor Gašpar met at the cottage.

Source: Topky / Ján Zemiar

The media coverage of the recordings came after the prosecutor’s office informed that the supervisory prosecutor of the Office of the Special Prosecutor’s Office had supplemented his proposal to extend the detention of the accused within the Purge action with video-audio recordings. These are intended to confirm the efforts of several people in politics, business and advocacy to influence the prosecution of the most serious criminal cases.

Diana Santus’ examination at the polygraph is not yet complete

The examination on the polygraph of the investigator of the Office of the Inspection Service (ÚIS) Diana Santusová has not been closed yet, it will probably continue. The chairman of the parliamentary fire safety committee Juraj Krúpa and the interior minister Roman Mikulec (both OĽANO) informed about it after the extraordinary meeting of the committee on Monday. The meeting was closed to the public.

“The investigation is not complete. This means that the National Security Office (NSA) performed the screening operation itself, provided the measured values ​​to the ministry, and we will continue on the basis of the things that came out. “ the minister approached, noting that he had not seen the results in person yet. He reiterated that the examination of a police officer in the NBU is not standard. However, according to him, they wanted to meet Santus’s needs.

Source: Topky / Ján Zemiar

NSA Director Roman Konečný stated that according to the NSA and the parliamentary control committee, everything went well. “It’s a communication contradiction rather than a factual contradiction,” evaluated after the committee.

As the vice-chairwoman of the committee Denisa Saková (unclassified) and member Marián Saloň (Smer-SD) emphasized, it was confirmed that Santusová did not turn to the NBU arbitrarily. The Office of the Inspection Service asked him of the NBU to comply with her doubts.

Santusová is a former head of a specialized investigation team set up under the authority of the Inspection Service. She was suspended in July. They justified this by doubts about its objectivity and impartiality. In order to refute them, she also had to undergo a polygraph examination.

The police intervention against Ján Hlinka was in accordance with the law, claims Juraj Krúpa

The use of coercive means in the mediated intervention against the citizen Ján Hlinka in Prievidza was in accordance with the law and regulations. The Chairman of the Committee of the National Council of the Slovak Republic for Defense and Security, Juraj Krúpa (OĽANO), informed about this after Monday’s extraordinary committee. According to him, the committee also agreed on this conclusion with the support of part of the opposition.

Source: Topky / Ján Zemiar

“He is a man who is being investigated in 17 offenses. Regardless of the fact that he is a pensioner and a disabled person, he is a provocateur who regularly does such activities.” declared Krupa. At the same time, he encouraged the police in similar interventions aimed at protecting decent citizens. Also in connection with other cases he talks about “Provocateurs who do not wear drapes and go to department stores and offices try to cause uproar and scare ordinary people”.

The Minister of the Interior Roman Mikulec (OĽANO) also defended the police, also in connection with last week’s intervention in the Piešťany trade. “No regulations or laws were violated, the intervention was legal, I stand behind the police, I express my support for them and the Police President,” he said after the committee to which he was invited together with interim police president Stefan Hamran.

In connection with the mandatory wearing of a veil, Krúpa also stated a problem in the Rules of Procedure. He wrote to the Speaker of the Parliament, Boris Kollár (We Are the Family), for a statement on how to proceed if a member of the committee refuses to wear a veil or other protective equipment in accordance with current measures. At present, according to him, it is only possible to interrupt the committee and, after continuing, request the deployment of the veil again.