Freccero: “Commendable Giorgianni, why punish those who defend the Constitution?”

Carlo Freccero on the pitch to give strength to the reasons for no vax and no green pass. The former director of Rai2 and former director of Viale Mazzini, in fact, defends the “commendable” position expressed by the magistrate Angelo Giorgianni, co-author, together with Pasquale Bacco, of the book ‘Massacre of State: the hidden truths of COVID-19’. Magistrate resigned from office after taking part in the demonstration on 9 October. In an exclusive interview with AdnKronos Freccero, he premises that “we live in a reversal, in a legal paradox in which the Government issues laws, or rather, more modestly, unconstitutional ‘law decrees’. This Government, presenting itself as an Institution, can censor and punish who defends the Constitution, accusing its complaints of unconstitutionality? Since the beginning of the pandemic, lawyers have been fighting unconstitutional laws with appeals that can only end up in ordinary courts “. “Who, however, due to their juridical architecture, cannot deliberate on unconstitutionality. These judges would be the only ones authorized to ask the Constitutional Court a question of unconstitutionality, but they do not! Citizens in this context cannot do anything. And the entire judiciary. seems blind and deaf to the problem. Therefore – observes Freccero – the case of a magistrate, Angelo Giorgianni, who sought a solution in international courts, where the problem is no longer constitutionality, but human rights defended by codes, is commendable. international, such as the Nuremberg Code which explicitly prohibits the administration of a drug, as well as experimentation on humans “.” I personally witnessed on television – says Freccero – an assault on Judge Giorgianni who allegedly accused the government of Nazism, while in reality the Nuremberg Code is a code of laws still in force signed by the Italian State “. According to Freccero, “the provision against Giorgianni is written in pure Newspeak when he accuses the magistrate of having publicly expressed considerations and judgments seriously damaging to the reputation and integrity of holders of public institutions and in particular of the President of the Council of Ministers and of the Ministry of Health , immediately identifiable persons, qualified as perpetrators of offenses similar to Nazi crimes and as such exercising abusive powers as they are responsible for adhering to the rules and implementing public health management guidelines in the context of the epidemiological emergency Covid-19 ‘” .Angelo Giorgianni, Freccero affirms, “has submitted this action to the International Tribunal in The Hague which has not yet expressed itself on the matter. It is therefore not a question of defamation, but of the exercise of the right”. Freccero then underlines that “with regard to the violation of the Nuremberg code, still in force and subject to verification by the international courts, Giorgianni would have denigrated the institutions by invoking ‘a new Nuremberg Trial, thus unequivocally pointing to public institutions as composed and direct from people comparable to Nazi criminals “. Here the refrain of Nazism returns as the only key to the present. The opponents of the system are Nazis. The alleged accusations of Nazism that Giorgianni would make to the government are intolerable”, reflects Freccero. “While the truth is another. We do not live – concludes Freccero – in the past, with our heads continually turned backwards. We live in the present and in the present there are still existing rules which are required to be respected precisely because they are still in force. Among these is the Nuremberg Code. All the rest is propaganda “.