Was the coronavirus born in the laboratory? Yes, according to a new study to be published by the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery and which is anticipated today by the Daily Mail. Research claims the coronavirus may only have been obtained in the laboratory “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Read also Studying for months, on the basis of articles found in databases and archives, the experiments carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology from 2002 to 2019, the two scientists who signed the ‘paper’, the British oncologist Angus Dalgleish and the Norwegian virologist Birger Sørensen, claim to have established that the coronavirus was created in the course of gain-of-function experiments, also called activating mutations (research temporarily banned in the United States whereby the genomes of viruses are altered to obtain more infectious ones). from a coronavirus taken in a cave with bats, Chinese scientists would have obtained the new ‘spike’ protein that transformed it into the Sars-Cov-2 at the origin of the pandemic and which, scientists point out, has no “credible natural ancestors” A chain of amino acids from the ‘spike’ of Sars-Cov-2 would be overwhelming proof of their thesis. It is thanks to their positive charge that the virus binds so effectively to human cells. But in nature it is difficult to find even just three positive amino acids together, since they repel each other. Four is “highly unlikely.” Chinese scientists would then “deliberately destroy, hide and contaminate the data” in Chinese laboratories and notes in order to “prevent scientists who wanted to share their findings from doing so.” The article, reports the Daily Mail, was rejected by several other prominent scientific journals.
1 thought on “Covid, ‘virus born in the laboratory’: two scientists have no doubts”
Comments are closed.
https://zenodo.org/record/4850024
https://zenodo.org/record/4849984
https://zenodo.org/record/4850020
https://zenodo.org/record/4849947
https://zenodo.org/record/4849938
https://zenodo.org/record/4849949
https://zenodo.org/record/4850101
https://zenodo.org/record/4850049
https://zenodo.org/record/4850053
https://zenodo.org/record/4850097
https://zenodo.org/record/4850119
https://zenodo.org/record/4850127
https://zenodo.org/record/4850109
https://zenodo.org/record/4850103
https://zenodo.org/record/4850105
https://zenodo.org/record/4850084
https://zenodo.org/record/4850060
https://zenodo.org/record/4850055
https://zenodo.org/record/4850153
https://zenodo.org/record/4850135
https://zenodo.org/record/4850091
https://zenodo.org/record/4850099
https://zenodo.org/record/4850074
https://zenodo.org/record/4850068
https://zenodo.org/record/4850129
https://zenodo.org/record/4850131
https://zenodo.org/record/4850072
https://zenodo.org/record/4850115
https://zenodo.org/record/4850121
https://zenodo.org/record/4850139
https://zenodo.org/record/4850147
https://zenodo.org/record/4850042
https://zenodo.org/record/4850064
https://zenodo.org/record/4850095
https://zenodo.org/record/4850133
https://zenodo.org/record/4850088
https://zenodo.org/record/4850079
https://zenodo.org/record/4850137
https://zenodo.org/record/4850123
https://zenodo.org/record/4850145
https://zenodo.org/record/4850044
https://zenodo.org/record/4850113
https://zenodo.org/record/4850086
https://zenodo.org/record/4850125
https://zenodo.org/record/4850081
https://zenodo.org/record/4850046
https://zenodo.org/record/4850141
https://zenodo.org/record/4850076
https://zenodo.org/record/4850070
https://zenodo.org/record/4850117