The hypothesis that the Covid-19 virus ‘escaped’ from the Wuhan virology laboratory is “absolutely credible” and “it is important to try to acquire as much data as possible and understand what happened”. This was stated by immunologist and virologist Guido Silvestri, a professor at Emory University in Atlanta, during the broadcast ‘Half an hour more’, arguing his thesis. “There is no – he explains – objective evidence or that the virus came naturally nor do we have evidence that it was a ‘leak’ from the Wuhan laboratory”. However, “if you do a close analysis of the virus sequence, there is a twelve-nucleotide zone of the spike protein that is particularly strange to explain with a simple switch from one virus to another.” In short, he argues, “everyone has found this sequence of proteins which is strange to consider through a natural recombination and we know that in Wuhan artificial viral variants have been developing for years that had an increased ability to infect humans”. This, he adds, “does not mean that this has happened, but it is an explanation that is not totally strange, it must be borne in mind that the onset of the pandemic took place 2.3 km away from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Without making conspiracy theories it is important to try to acquire as much data as possible and understand what happened “. Among other things, he says, “there are records of experiments in virology laboratories and it can be traced back to the experiments and sequences generated in a given period”.
1 thought on “Covid, Silvestri: “Virus hypothesis escaped from a credible laboratory””
Comments are closed.
https://zenodo.org/record/4819845
https://zenodo.org/record/4820011
https://zenodo.org/record/4819861
https://zenodo.org/record/4819867
https://zenodo.org/record/4819835
https://zenodo.org/record/4819851
https://zenodo.org/record/4819863
https://zenodo.org/record/4819991
https://zenodo.org/record/4819825
https://zenodo.org/record/4819871
https://zenodo.org/record/4819869
https://zenodo.org/record/4819843
https://zenodo.org/record/4819831
https://zenodo.org/record/4819875
https://zenodo.org/record/4820015
https://zenodo.org/record/4819879
https://zenodo.org/record/4819903
https://zenodo.org/record/4820027
https://zenodo.org/record/4819917
https://zenodo.org/record/4819971
https://zenodo.org/record/4819915
https://zenodo.org/record/4819939
https://zenodo.org/record/4819889
https://zenodo.org/record/4819921
https://zenodo.org/record/4819885
https://zenodo.org/record/4819893
https://zenodo.org/record/4819881
https://zenodo.org/record/4819899
https://zenodo.org/record/4819887
https://zenodo.org/record/4819907
https://zenodo.org/record/4820021
https://zenodo.org/record/4819901
https://zenodo.org/record/4819897
https://zenodo.org/record/4819913
https://zenodo.org/record/4819891
https://zenodo.org/record/4819923
https://zenodo.org/record/4819958
https://zenodo.org/record/4819979
https://zenodo.org/record/4820307
https://zenodo.org/record/4819973
https://zenodo.org/record/4819931
https://zenodo.org/record/4819935
https://zenodo.org/record/4819960
https://zenodo.org/record/4819943
https://zenodo.org/record/4819964
https://zenodo.org/record/4819941
https://zenodo.org/record/4819966
https://zenodo.org/record/4819929
https://zenodo.org/record/4819949
https://zenodo.org/record/4819945