Constitutional Court, maternal surname and Pillon: storm over the senator

“But isn’t the #maternal #surname by chance the #surname of the maternal grandfather or great-grandfather?”. The Council establishes the illegitimacy of the automatic attribution of the father’s surname to the children and Simone Pillon jokes about the sentence on Twitter, attracting criticism and teasing. In fact, for the Northern League senator, who returned today to the subject with a long post published on Facebook, there would be other “priorities” to be found “elsewhere” even if “I am not a priori contrary to the double surname. After all, it could already be done, albeit with an unnecessarily complex procedure “. A little too much for users, who on the passage of the new post that reads “the patronymic guarantees the child membership of a lineage, makes him immediately part of a story and a group” and “I have the feeling that someone wants to use the reform to deal the coup de grace to the already undermined paternal figure “they protest vigorously. Read also “You don’t hide anything in Pillon, he’s not as stupid as us”, they ironically, as they publish smiling father-son photos in the company of a laboratory incubator: “Look at what a beautiful family photo: the father who donated membership to a story, to a community, to a family, the little son and the incubator who donated the body “, they write. “In more modern and civilized countries than ours this law has existed since we still had honor killing and criminal shotgun marriages” they underline, while there is no lack of appeals to the (probable) new majority shareholder of Twitter: “Elon Musk – they ask – see if you can do something good stop Simone Pillon from speaking thanks “.” What two #surnames #Pillon with this story of #maternal #cognomematerno “, they let off steam while throwing the arrow:” Think I’m high. grandfather is the same as that of grandmother. Tiè “. But that’s not all: in open controversy with the senator, users also dust off a post by Pillon on the subject dated February 13, 2021.” In my opinion – wrote the Northern League player at the time – the surname paternal is not to be considered as a patriarchal heritage but as the most precious gift that a father can give to his children. The mother gives the body, the father hands over belonging to a story, to a community, to a family “, the phrase indicted. “Is it possible to insert machismo, misogyny, objectification of women in a single sentence? Of course, today Mr Pillon explains it to us!”, They retort, attacking: “If you have not understood it for Pillon, women are just ovens that they just bake bread. “