Justice, M5s: “Cartabia reform must be changed”

“The reform of the criminal trial developed by Minister Marta Cartabia must be modified”. Thus in a note the deputies and deputies of the 5-star Movement in the justice commission according to which the hearing of Nicola Gratteri, chief prosecutor of Catanzaro, “was dramatically clear”. “Among all the criticisms expressed by Gratteri – they add – the ones that are most worrying, as they foreshadow disturbing scenarios, are related to the concrete consequences: ‘convenience to commit a crime’ and ‘decrease in the level of security for the nation'”. The pentastellated parliamentarians continue: “Gratteri has correctly announced a ‘huge increase in appeals and appeals to the Supreme Court’ because ‘with this reform everyone, no one excluded, should appeal and then appeal to the Supreme Court, if only to give more work and engulf more the machinery of justice “. These are considerations that must induce everyone to deeply review and modify the reform, especially with regard to prescription and inadmissibility. The future of the country is at stake”, they conclude. GratteriCon the new rules on prescription “the 50% of the trials, even serious ones “will not be celebrated in light of the impossibility of proceeding after two years for the appeal and one for the Supreme Court. The alarm was raised by the prosecutor of Catanzaro, Nicola Gratteri, heard by the Chamber’s justice commission. Gratteri expressed the fear that “the 7 maxi trials that are taking place in Catanzaro as the law is expected today will be declared inadmissible”, specifying that the trials that risk not being celebrated concern not only mafia crimes but also those against the public administration. “In concrete terms, the consequences will be a decrease in the level of security for the nation, given that it is certainly even more convenient to commit a crime”, is the risk associated with the rules on the new prescription contained in the government amendments to the draft law of reform of the criminal process denounced by Gratteri. The reference is to the impossibility of prosecution envisaged by the new rules, after the predetermined times for the appeal and the Cassation, respectively two years and one year. “Fixing a trap with such a narrow term means not ensuring that everything is analyzed with due attention,” he added. “At this point it would be better to go back to the rules on the statute of limitations of the crime as they were before the Bonafede reform, they would cause less damage”. De Raho The new statute of limitations, with the impracticability of crimes after two years for the appeal and one for the Supreme Court, ” undermines the security of the country “, argued the national anti-mafia and anti-terrorism prosecutor Federico Cafiero De Raho in the justice committee in the Chamber. “It is an aspect that falls on the security of our democracy – he explained – Imagining that so many trials will be declared inadmissible is something that undermines the security of our country.” of thousands of trials that already go into statute of limitations today, not after the reform but already today, are a defeat for the state “. Thus the Minister of Justice Marta Cartabia, in Naples during a meeting on the trial office at the Palazzo di Giustizia. “We can no longer afford it – he added – if the answer arrives late and in an unreasonable time, it is also a defeat of the State. All the Caines and the Abels await a severe, just and timely judgment. This is what the Constitution asks of us and I have no other compasses “. Justice: Aiello (Mixed-Idv), ‘Gratteri alarm worrying'” The alarm of Gratteri on the consequences of the Cartabia reform is worrying and cannot go unheard “. This is how Piera Aiello, deputy of Italia dei Valori and witness of justice under escort comments on the hearing in the justice commission of the Camera del Prosecutor of Catanzaro Nicola Gratteri on the reform of justice. “50% of serious trials are at risk – explains the parliamentarian – and the new prescription will make it more convenient to commit a crime. Not to mention the impact on the ongoing proceedings instituted by the prosecutor of Catanzaro. I invite all my colleagues to consider your words and reflect on the advisability of a reform that seems more useful for to consent to the requests of the EU than to make justice truly effective “.