Mps-David Rossi, legal wife and daughter: “Ignored trace between the 3rd and 4th floors, he can dismantle suicide from the office”

A trace, between the window of the fourth and third floor, on which no further investigations have been carried out but which, if it were compatible with David Rossi’s shoe, could cast doubt on the thesis of suicide from the third floor of Palazzo Salimbeni. This is what the lawyer Carmelo Miceli, lawyer of Rossi’s wife, Antonella Tognazzi, and her daughter Carolina Orlandi reveals to the Adnkronos, referring to a particular content in the RIS consultancy in the context of the second investigation into the death of the former Head of Communications of Mps. The day after the hearing of Nicola Marini, on the evening of the prosecutor’s death on duty, before the Commission of inquiry into the death of David Rossi, the lawyer observes: “Because Marini values ​​the product comparison that was made on all the traces found below the third floor window and instead forgets to mention that there is a similar trace that was found above the third floor window, exactly between the fourth and third floor window, and forgets to mention that on this trace it is not Has no comparative product survey been carried out? “. “Perhaps because this trace, if it were to give a positive comparison, would dismantle the suicide theory from the third floor?”, Continues the lawyer referring to a trace found “in the Zavattaro consultancy in the context of the second investigation” on the death of the former manager . “It is incomprehensible – reiterates the lawyer – that Marini says nothing about that trace found between the window of the fourth and third floor, the nature of which was evidently similar to those sent for comparison but of whose product comparison there is no trace to the investigation documents “. “The feeling is that Marini values ​​everything that can lead to crediting the suicide thesis and forgets what that theory could demolish it”, he continues. The lawyer also replies to the statements made yesterday by the prosecutor on files found in Rossi’s pc. “The prosecutor Marini, in an incomprehensible way, makes a substantial equation between the discovery of files and the alleged execution of searches by Rossi, on his PC, with the word ‘suicides’ – he underlines – In fact, this morning I read in all the newspapers that the thesis has been credited that he would even have done 35 searches on his PC with the word ‘suicide’. The circumstance that the finding of files in a PC with that word can be identified by research is false and devoid of any foundation “. “What is true is that 35 files were found, including 23 emails, in the life of Rossi’s pc as a whole, which referred to the word suicide, but none of these documents has ever been shown to have searched for the word suicide. What strikes me is that Marini reports or agrees to a similar reconstruction on which, according to the documents that Genoa refers to Siena, he should have made further investigations – Miceli observes – The postal police itself, in fact, a circumstance incomprehensibly omitted by Marini, urges the ‘absolute need to carry out further investigations also in relation to the activities actually carried out through that PC and stored on the hard disk. but a reading is even given aimed at enhancing the suicide thesis even more “. Another theme touched upon during the hearing it is the man who in the video of that evening is seen looking out into the alley. “The motivation that Marini offered to the Commission of Inquiry on the non-registration in the register of suspects of the person who enters the alley and looks towards the body of David Rossi appeared absurd, incomprehensible, irrational and non-compliant with the criminal procedure code”, observes the lawyer Miceli. In the same way, according to the lawyer, “the way in which Marini discharges on the judicial police the responsibility for the failure to carry out certain investigative acts, one of all, the failure to acquire telephone cells is absolutely incomprehensible and irrational”. According to the lawyer of her wife and her daughter, the prosecutor’s attitude shows in summary “a lack of serenity of judgment and the lack of that impartiality that the head of a prosecutor should have to which the request for reopening of the investigations: in our opinion, therefore, Marini’s statements demonstrate, once again, the environmental incompatibility of that power of attorney to deal with a possible request to reopen the investigations “.