Pensions, Draghi-trade union summit. Pressing of the League

Budget maneuver 2022. Prime Minister Mario Draghi summoned the leaders of CGIL, CISL and UIL for today. As for pensions, the 100 quota – it was reiterated – will be archived but the opinion of the unions on the hypotheses advanced as an alternative was categorical. ” The proposed Quota 102 and 104, if confirmed by the Government, would constitute a real mockery for the workers. With those constraints, only a few thousand people in the next few years will be able to access retirement ‘, said the confederal secretary of the CGIL Roberto Ghiselli. In the meantime, yesterday the prime minister met the secretary of the Lega Matteo Salvini. In the long and positive conversation, Salvini – reads a note – illustrated his proposals to relaunch the country and defend jobs and pensions. The League is working on “saving pensions”, to avoid returning to Fornero. In the morning it was Claudio Durigon, head of the Lega’s Labor Department, who underlined that, “the goal is not to return to Fornero”. “Contrary to what some media claim – reads a note – the League is not ‘towards the yes’ to the new pension measures. We are still working on the reform, with common sense and determination.” Durigon was echoed by the undersecretary of the Mef della Lega, Federico Freni: “The League’s objective is to avoid a return to Fornero: the discussion for a reasonable reform is underway. It is useless to dwell now on numbers and quotas: we must give concrete answers to workers who are waiting to be able to retire “, he said. Confindustria The president of Confindustria, Carlo Bonomi, reiterates his no to quotas on pensions and asks for an intervention on the jobs He does so on the sidelines of the assembly of the Industrial Union of Turin, in which he underlined: “We are strongly opposed to an quota of 100, 102 or 104 because we look at the numbers as entrepreneurs and the numbers say that the quota 100 has not obtained the effect that we expected “.” I remember – he added – that we were told that for one who retired, three were hired, in reality the effect is 0.4, so we do not even have the replacement effect. So we are retiring those who have a job and we are not offering a job to young people. “” We believe, instead, that we should work on strenuous jobs, on which there is actually a problem. We work on that again, “Bonomi reiterated. 102 and 104 and to the much more flexible one of the trade unions. It is the one illustrated several times in parliament by the INPS president, Pasquale Tridico, who again last week presented it as the only “truly flexible and financially compatible” solution in terms of costs and from the audience much more consistent than the Northern League experimentation has ever brought home. We are talking about the so-called two-stage pension: the hypothesis is to anticipate, for those who have turned 63-64 years old and want to leave their job, only the contribution share of the pension by postponing the total allowance, including the salary part, to the age of 67. Once the retirement pension has been reached, however, the worker will be entitled to the full allowance, complete with Salary ota and contribution rate. No rigid ‘cage’ therefore within which to contain future retirees only the opportunity of choice with costs for the State coffers, in the medium term, substantially zero. On balance, the INPS still estimated, there would be about 203 thousand additional pensions that can be activated between 2022 and 2024 to which another 129 thousand from 2025 to 2027 would be added for a total of 332 thousand pensions from 2022 to 2027. And the costs would also be around to 4.2 million euros between 2022 and 2027 which would then be recovered from spending savings that from 2027 to 2031 could amount to about 2 billion euros in total. age requirement, at least 63-64 years you must have at least 20 years of contributions and have accrued at the time of choice a pension contribution of an amount equal to or greater than 1.2 times the social allowance. This is to limit the audience that will be able to access early retirement and avoid poor checks. The proposal also provides for the accumulation of the mini-pension with the income from dependent, self-employed work and the possibility of anchoring the performance to future generational relay mechanisms, linked to part time while categorically excludes the possibility of coexistence with the Rdc, the bee social security and compensation for the cessation of commercial activity. The proposal had received criticism from CGIL, CISL and UIL and the government did not in fact express itself on this. The “decision is political”, commented Tridico in recent days.