US Supreme Court temporarily bans publication of Trump’s tax returns

Former United States President Donald Trump – Former President Trump asked the Supreme Court to suspend the publication of his tax return In this way, Trump’s legal team has managed to get the Supreme Court to stop the publication of his tax returns The former president’s lawyers presented their petition to the Supreme Court pointing to the impossibility of publishing Trump’s fiscal exercisesThe chief judge of the Supreme Court of the United States, John Roberts, has temporarily prohibited the publication of the fiscal declarations of former President Donald Trump, thus accessing the request presented on Monday by the former president .Former President Trump asked the Supreme Court to suspend the publication of his tax return by the Tax Service to a committee of the House of Representatives, led by members of the Democratic Party. Trump presented said urgent request after a appeals court paved the way for his tax return passed into the hands of the Committee on Means and Arbitrators of the House of Representatives in the coming days. This is the fastest way that exists for the Lower House of the United States Parliament to obtain the declarations of the former president after having requested them without success in different ways over the last few years. In this way, Trump’s legal team has managed to get the Supreme Court to stop the publication of his tax returns while waiting for other judicial instances to evaluate whether or not to accept an open case to review the rulings of the Justice that approve this disclosure. The former president’s lawyers presented their petition to the Supreme Court pointing to the impossibility of publishing Trump’s fiscal exercises, since the ruling of the Court of Appeals that allows their disclosure enters into force on Thursday, within three days. “No Congress has ever exercised its legislative powers to require the tax returns of a president”, Trump himself has denounced on occasion, who has warned that the decision of the Court of Appeals will have “far-reaching implications”.