Liberal Democrats withdraw letter asking Biden for a change in political strategy in Ukraine

This is how this Ukrainian soldier plays the violin in a bomb shelter 0:43 (CNN) — US MP Pramila Jayapal withdrew a controversial letter she published about Ukraine’s diplomacy after backlash from members of her Congressional Progressive Group, who They said it was written months ago but sent this week without their knowledge. “The letter was written several months ago, but unfortunately it was published by her staff without being examined. As the group’s president, I accept responsibility for it,” she said in a statement. “The letter sent yesterday (for this Monday), although it reiterates that basic principle, has been confused with the GOP’s opposition to supporting the just defense of the national sovereignty of the Ukrainians. As such, it is a distraction at this time and we withdraw the letter,” he adds. House Democrats bristled at Jayapal for sending a letter calling on the Biden administration to pursue Ukraine diplomacy, with many fuming publicly and privately over the fact that the progressive leader surprised them with a letter revealing new divisions within his party over the war and just days before the midterm elections in November. “People are furious, especially frontline members,” said a senior House Democrat, referring to the most vulnerable members who are at risk of losing their seats in the Nov. 8 midterm elections. In the letter, more than two dozen liberal members of the House of Representatives called on President Joe Biden to reverse course on his Ukraine strategy and pursue direct diplomacy with Russia to end the months-long conflict. . In the letter sent Monday, 30 Democrats praised Biden’s efforts to date in supporting Ukraine while avoiding direct US involvement on the ground. However, they suggested that a more forceful attempt to end the war through diplomacy is necessary to avoid a long and lingering conflict. “Given the destruction created by this war for Ukraine and the world, as well as the risk of catastrophic escalation, we also believe that it is in the interest of Ukraine, the United States and the world to avoid a protracted conflict,” the letter from the group led by the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Pramila Jayapal. “For this reason, we urge you to pair the military and economic support that the United States has provided Ukraine with a proactive diplomatic push, redoubling efforts to seek a realistic framework for a ceasefire,” she added. The willingness of lawmakers to maintain the massive financial and military support that has been given to Ukraine has been questioned in Congress. Some Republicans have threatened to cut aid to the country if they take control of Congress in November. The Liberal Democrats, in their letter, said more direct attempts to engage Moscow in diplomacy were needed while the war dragged on. IMF: World Economies and Markets Affected by Ukraine Conflict 2:59 “We are under no illusions about the difficulties of Russia’s involvement, given its outrageous and illegal invasion of Ukraine and its decision to make further illegal annexations of Ukrainian territory,” the lawmakers wrote. “However, if there is a way to end the war while preserving a free and independent Ukraine, it is the responsibility of the United States to pursue all diplomatic avenues to support that solution that is acceptable to the people of Ukraine,” they said. John Kirby, strategic communications coordinator for the National Security Council, said the White House had received the letter. “We certainly appreciate the sentiments expressed by these members of Congress,” Kirby said. “We have been working with members of Congress throughout this process, especially as we have needed additional funds to support Ukraine’s defense needs,” Kirby said. “And it’s been done in full collaboration in full transparency with members of Congress. And that’s exactly the way the president wants to continue moving forward.” Still, Kirby said there was no indication that Russian President Vladimir Putin was willing to engage in serious diplomacy to end the war. “When you see and hear his rhetoric, and you see the other things, whether it’s the atrocities, the war crimes, the air strikes against civilian infrastructure that the Russians are committing, it’s clear that Mr Putin is not in the mood. to negotiate,” Kirby said. He said that it will depend on Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelensky, when is the right time to return to the negotiating table. “Mr. Zelensky can determine when he thinks the time is right, and Mr. Zelensky can determine, because it’s his country, what success looks like, what victory looks like, and what kind of terms he’s willing to negotiate,” Kirby said. “We’re not going to dictate that.”