Between voyeurism and misogyny, social networks take over the Depp-Heard trial – 20 Minutes

It is a highly publicized and very popular trial that opened in the state of Virginia, in the United States, a few weeks ago. At the origins of the story, multiple trials between the two ex-spouses, Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, since their divorce in 2017, where the latter accused him of verbal and physical violence under the influence of drugs and alcohol . In 2018, the actress wrote a column in The Washington Post, where, without quoting her ex-husband, she indicated that she had become a “public figure representing domestic violence”: it was on this statement that Johnny Depp filed a complaint for defamation, claiming $50 million from his ex-wife. Which has initiated a counter-suit, for 100 million dollars, accusing him of a smear campaign. Court TV, a channel specializing in the areas of police-justice, court atmosphere and criminal investigations. A broadcast that also takes place on social networks, YouTube, Twitter and Tik Tok in the lead, where summaries are presented and analyzed after each day of hearing. A trial of stars, but above all of evidence: with photos, videos, text messages and sound recordings, the two parties come to talk about their relationship in what is most intimate, from their sexual relations to their private exchanges . Access to this content has been blocked in order to respect your choice of consent By clicking on “I ACCEPT”, you accept the deposit of cookies by external services and will thus have access to the content of our partners I ACCEPT And for better remunerate 20 Minutes, do not hesitate to accept all cookies, even for one day only, via our “I accept for today” button in the banner below. More information on the Cookie Management Policy page. Misogyny campaignStéphanie Lukasik, doctor in information and communication sciences, is not surprised by the attraction of social networks for this trial: “It is in the continuity of a new informational ecosystem, in which social networks are becoming the main channels of information,” she says. It is more particularly on Tik Tok that we find the majority of this content related to the trial: comments on the statements of one or the other, montages of video extracts on dramatic music, conspiracy analyzes to prove the Amber Heard’s lies, emotional testimonials from fans about Johnny Depp’s sadness… At this stage of the trial, the Internet seems to have taken sides for the most part: Amber Heard is a liar, and Johnny Depp a victim. “We are moving from a court of justice to a socio-digital court, because we know that social networks tend to exacerbate the polarization of opinions” adds Stéphanie Lukasik. On Twitter, the hashtag #JusticeForJohnnyDepp explodes, accompanying a number of misogynistic messages. The witches who play the traumatized pardonnnnnn #JusticeForJohnnyDepp pic.twitter.com/PL1B6ZeWZ0— 🍒 (@beyicious) May 4, 2022

Access to this content has been blocked in order to respect your choice of consent By clicking on “I ACCEPT”, you accept the deposit of cookies by external services and will thus have access to the content of our partners I ACCEPT And for better remunerate 20 Minutes, do not hesitate to accept all cookies, even for one day only, via our “I accept for today” button in the banner below. More information on the Cookie Management Policy page.

If the trial between Amber Heard and Johnny Depp is not the first over-mediatized trial in Hollywood, it takes a particular turn due to the involvement of Internet users. “What I find interesting and unprecedented with this case is that it happens at the culmination of several web phenomena: a bizarre mixture of different online communities, web investigators…” says Lucie Ronfaut, journalist specializing in news technologies. As the journalist writes in her Rule 30 newsletter, these content creators include a mix of Johnny Depp fans, anti-feminist and transphobic activists, web investigators and crime fans, as well as number of opportunists who do not hesitate to ride the polemic. Each argument of the two parties is combed through, from the brand of makeup used by Amber Heard to hide her bruises to the scabrous details of sexual violence, through the attitude and dress of the protagonists during the trial. “One of the main objectives in sharing this content is to express one’s opinion and to persuade through emotions,” says Stéphanie Lukasik. The responsibility of platforms At the end of the day, we have the feeling, as Internet user, for not being able to simply be indifferent to this matter. Lucie Ronfaut headlined her newsletter of April 27 as follows: I don’t want to see Johnny Depp on Tik Tok: “There is a side where we are forced to be interested in it, due to the algorithmic recommendation of Tik Tok, which highlights this type of content more than others. This For You Page (home page that offers videos based on tastes and similarities, editor’s note), we don’t really know how it works, but I guess Tik Tok guessed that women my age had a link with Johnny Depp one way or another. It’s a local phenomenon that becomes ultra viral, completely algorithmic, ”explains the journalist. Unlike other platforms, Tik Tok does not allow you to silence a hashtag or a recurring subject, potentially disturbing for some people. Anyone can come across testimonies of sexual violence between two cat videos. “It also proves that everything is contained and everything can be contained: your cat, the demonstrations at the Capitol, the trials… We have become so used to transforming ourselves into content, to segmenting ourselves on social networks, that ‘we apply this operation to everything,’ adds Lucie Ronfaut. Even if it means treating a trial like a television series, taking fan tools to apply them in a logic of virality, coming to feed an opinion. “When we talk about rabbit hole, that is to say this spiral of content that we have trouble controlling, it is not only on the far right, it can affect a lot of subjects. It’s very disturbing to see teenagers joking about domestic violence, ”concludes Lucie Ronfaut. strength of algorithms.