The referendum in New Caledonia, “a consultation devoid of its meaning”

Published on :

The “no” to the independence of New Caledonia won by an overwhelming majority in the referendum held on Sunday – and marked by a record abstention. A “non-analyzable” result according to Isabelle Merle, historian and research director at CNRS, for whom the ballot should have been postponed.

According to provisional results provided by the High Commission of the Republic, the “no” to independence won 96.5% of the vote on Sunday – a much higher level than in the 2018 and 2020 referendums, where it had respectively obtained 57% and 53% of the votes. But the ballot was marked by the collapse of participation, which stood at only 43.9%, against nearly 80% in 2020 and 73.7% in 2018. For the historian Isabelle Merle, this abstention is the mark of “a failure, of a political impasse, and even of a political fault from the point of view of the history of New Caledonia. […] It’s a consultation that has been emptied of its meaning […] and it is sad, after this long process of decolonization, to come to this loss of meaning. “

The CNRS research director regrets the non-postponement of the referendum to a more favorable moment. “It would have been easy to postpone it to 2022, everyone would have been responsible for this consultation. For all parties, it was essential.” The separatists had called on voters to boycott the election for lack of obtaining its postponement, which they demanded due to a sharp increase, since September, in cases of Covid-19 contamination.

With AFP and Reuters

1 thought on “The referendum in New Caledonia, “a consultation devoid of its meaning””

Comments are closed.