Delphine Jubillar: why the 145 calls from her lover’s wife to an unknown number would not be so suspicious

A lot of new information has recently come out about the Jubillar affair which, however, has not seen any real progress for a little while. On December 15, 2021, it will be a year since Delphine Jubillar will have mysteriously disappeared from her home in Cagnac-les-Mines, near Toulouse. Her husband Cédric Jubillar has been indicted for spousal murder, but in the absence of a body and tangible evidence, he is still presumed innocent. His lawyers have often pointed out the lack of research on the side of Delphine’s lover and his companion, who was in contact with Delphine on the day of the disappearance. According to Parisian, My Jean-Baptiste Alary, Alexandre Martin and Emmanuelle Franck would thus have expressed their regret about little explored avenues during a closed-door hearing on November 16.

For the moment, no suspicious element has yet been discovered on the side of Montauban’s lover and of the one who is now his ex-companion. The latter has been in contact with Delphine Jubillar December 15, to a priori to clarify things in their respective process of separation from their companions. At 2:22 pm, Delphine Jubillar sent him: “I will step aside, be discreet, let you digest the news and leave you with your family as you wish. Have a good day”. The calls that the lover’s ex-companion will then make to reach the nurse will go unanswered. Outraged exchanges that seem calm, the cell phone of the lover’s ex-companion also proves that she did not turn it off on the night of December 15 to 16, and – if she kept it with her – that she did always been located near his home in Montauban, 80km from Cagnac-les-Mines.

Where is Delphine Jubillar?

Finally there was question of 145 possible calls made to an unknown number. Always according to the Parisian, it is not a question of calls but of 145 times when the young woman of about thirty years has used an internet connection via his laptop, whether for his emails, Snapchat, WhatsApp or other. These connections have generated data which, if “they appear on itemized phone bills“, remain impossible to”attach to a correspondent’s number“as our cronfrères specify. The mention of these 145 elements is therefore in no way proof that the ex-companion of Montauban’s lover would have been in contact 145 times with the same unknown person.

Loading widget

Subscribe to the Closermag.fr newsletter to receive the latest news free of charge