Moro, archive ex br Persichetti: Cassation rejects appeal

“For the Court of Cassation, at the current stage of the investigations, it is legitimate to assume that the dissemination, on 8 December 2015, less than 48 hours after the official publication, of some pages of the first draft of the annual report of the Moro 2 commission, falls within this case of the crime of disclosure of confidential information “. Writes on the blog Insorgenze Paolo Persichetti, the former BR today a historical researcher and author, among other things, of books and inquiries on the Moro case investigated by the Rome prosecutor’s office on the accusation of having disclosed confidential material “acquired and / or elaborated by the Commission parliamentary investigator on the kidnapping and murder of Aldo Moro “. “The judges of the Supreme Court – wrote Persichetti – rejected the appeal presented by the lawyer Francesco Romeo against the decision of the court of review which last July had changed the charge from which the seizure had arisen, the previous 8 June , of my historical archive and of the medical and school records of my children and of other administrative and strictly personal material of my family. subversive with the purpose of terrorism and subversion of the constitutional order. The reasons for the decision, extremely laconic in the formulation of the device, ‘the court rejects the appeal and condemns the court costs’, will be disclosed no earlier than three weeks “. “The decision of the Supreme Court makes the matter even more intricate because on 17 December the magistrate Valerio Savio will have to rule on the legitimacy of the seizure of the archive without taking into account the decision of the review court and the cassation. The legal justification of the seizure remains in fact anchored to the initial accusation hypotheses, aiding and abetting and subversive association, already rejected by the investigating magistrate when he rejected the request for a probative incident “. A situation that Persichetti does not hesitate to define as “Kafkaesque”.