Pensions towards 102 in 2022, League satisfied

Maneuver 2022, 102 for a single year, 2022, with an ad hoc fund to accompany workers who would end up being penalized by the new requirements. In the control room on the maneuver still underway at Palazzo Chigi, government sources confirmed to the Adnkronos that this is the formula on pensions that should be reflected in the budget law that will land on the CDM table today. Read also Lega Satisfied the League, opposed to a return to the Fornero law, given that we are moving towards retirement at 64 (instead of 67) while maintaining 38 years of contributions. In addition to the ad hoc fund of 500 million to accompany some categories to the early exit from the world of work with the rules of Quota 100, government sources had confirmed that the so-called ‘quota 41’ would be the proposal that the League was preparing to put forward in the control room. It is a ’41 fixed quota ‘, government sources had explained, in the sense that the 41 years of contributions must be combined with the 62 years of age, with the result of a 103 quota with a contribution criterion that remains substantially fixed. This is for 2022, because for 2023 the system proposed by the League, and which the former undersecretary of the Mef and current head of Labor for the Carroccio Claudio Durigon works on the front line, provides for a 63 + 41 scheme, which, numbers in hand The Democratic Party for its part has asked to continue the dialogue with the social partners on pensions and taxes. This is the request made by the dem, according to what is learned from government sources, in the control room. In the afternoon, Roberto Speranza also asked to go on with the dialogue. “Never as today the country needs unity. We must continue to dialogue with the trade unions and the social forces”, said the head of delegation of Leu, intercepted by the Adnkronos in the Chamber. Trade unions “We have proposed to improve the Fornero law precisely to respond” to the needs “of young people with a guarantee pension, with a stable and not precarious job, recognizing the burden of jobs that are not all the same, introducing the right at 62 to choose to be able to retire, to recognize care work and to recognize the female difference that in recent years has not been recognized “, said the leader of the CGIL, Maurizio Landini, speaking to TG1.Grillo” I am a genius understood, unfortunately, and for this reason I want to share with you a simple proposal, fair and sustainable that could bring everyone to agree on the subject of pensions Since 1996 the pension system in our country has been contributory, that is: you retire with the contributions you have accrued. Previously it was of a more generous salary type, one retired on the basis of the last salaries received at the end of his career, certainly higher (sometimes even artificially increased at the end of his career …). The problem of the pension system today is represented by the mixed system: that is workers with the salary and contributory model, a problem that we will have until 2035 “. So Beppe Grillo, in a speech on his blog on pensions.” The solution to this There is a dilemma, and it is very simple, and it has also been recently proposed by INPS: we allow workers of the mixed system to retire at 63 with the contribution rate accrued to date, and we give them at the age of 67 , the ordinary age of old age, the salary part “, suggests the guarantor M5S.” A choice “, continues Grillo,” that would make happy those people who want flexibility, who need or want to retire earlier, because they suffer mobbing , because they are tired, because they do hard work and are unable to reach 67 years of age. But financial sustainability would also be happy: in fact, workers would retire early with what they have accrued. Humanity and financial sustainability would therefore be combined. In fact, the pension advance does not definitively penalize those workers, because they will have the salary part, as expected, at 67 years of age “.